Dayton Agreement Of 1995
Academics` views on the Dayton Accords are very divided. Was it an ingenious advance whose framework was to be used in other contemporary conflicts, especially in the Middle East? Or was it a useful but deeply flawed instrument, whose problems include minimal cooperation between its units and an excessively decentralized system of governance, co-responsible for the erosion of the rule of law? On October 13, 1997, the Croatian right-wing party in 1861 and the right-wing Party Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1861 asked the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina to overturn several decisions and uphold a decision of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and, more importantly, to verify the constitutionality of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, given that it was claimed , the agreement violates the constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina in a way that undermines the integrity of the state and could lead to the dissolution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Court has come to the conclusion that it has no jurisdiction to rule on the dispute concerning those decisions, since the applicants were not covered by s. VI.3, point a), of the Constitution, concerning persons who may challenge the Court of Justice. The Court also rejected the other request: the war in Croatia lasted until January 1992, when an unconditional ceasefire established a turbulent peace between the Croatian government and ethnic Serbs. The war between Croats and Bosniaks ended with the signing of the Washington Agreement in March 1994 and ended an uncomfortable alliance known as the Bosnian-Croat federation. Meanwhile, fighting between Croatian and Bosnian forces and Serbs continued despite international efforts for a lasting ceasefire, including a no-fly zone, a fire-free zone around Sarajevo and humanitarian operations. In February 1994, when NATO first used force, NATO fighter jets shot down four Serbian aircraft that violated the no-fly zone. Later, in May 1995, NATO conducted air raids on the Serbian stronghold of Pale. The speeches, from a podium in front of 23 flags, placed in French alphabetical series, were strictly limited to six minutes each. Alija Izetbegovic, the president of Bosnia, said: „My government signs this agreement without any enthusiasm, as someone who takes a bitter but useful potion.” On 13 February 2008, the head of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mr. Eljko Komié, declared that the original Dayton Agreements had been lost from the presidency`s archives. The High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina Miroslav Lajak said: „I don`t know if the news is sad or funny.” [24] On 16 November 2009, the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs handed over the certified copy of the Dayton Agreements to the French Embassy in Sarajevo.
The copy was then handed over to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. [25] The original was found in 2017 in a private residence in Pale, which led to the arrest of one person. [26] The most serious threat to paraphrased peace this week comes from the Bosnian Serbs, who not only publicly denounced the agreement, but privately refused to open either the map or the military annexes to the long and complex agreement.