Publicat pe

Bhp Os Enterprise Agreement

Publicat pe

Bhp Os Enterprise Agreement

In December 2019, OS submitted business plans for a series of provisions of the two enterprise agreements. The FWC also sent an email to OS MCAP modeling wage rates, indicating that the agreement did not exceed BOOT. OC MCAP responded that the modelling was imprecise and that the agreements had been made by the BOOT. The union has long argued that voters may not have fully understood the pay and conditions enjoyed by highly unionized workers at BHP`s coal mines in Queensland, and national chairman Tony Maher said he was pleased to see the controversial agreements „in the trash where they need to be.” BHP now has another opportunity to have the fair work commission approve the agreements. IT IS POSSIBLE that BHP must make „commitments” to improve aspects of the agreement in order to obtain approval. AMMA is disappointed that the agreements on resource companies were voted on by workers and submitted to the Fair Work Commission 18 months ago, subject to delays and lingering uncertainties in the authorisation process. Moreover, „it is not sufficiently open that DP Boyce was satisfied that compliance with S 180 (5) (excluding bonds) was present and that, therefore, the agreement had indeed been concluded.” Australian business agreements are intended to define terms and conditions in a company, workplace or on a site. But BHP thought they had found a smart way to get around the spirit of the law. Two agreements registered for Operations Services employees were voted on by a small number of iron ore workers in the Pilbara. The FWC Committee accepted our arguments that the main conditions of the agreements were not explained to the workers. Our Union has always argued that the agreements are unfair because they include conditions in senek that are well below industrial standards for coal miners, including lower wages without annual wage increases and the possibility of transferring to a BHP mining site in Australia. The UNION objected to the approval of the enterprise service agreements because „BHP already has very good operating agreements at its coal plant and its Operations Services employees earn the same wages and conditions as the workers directly employed at its side,” Maher said.

Our message to Operations Services employees is that we are committed to bringing your salaries and conditions back to the level of BHP`s staff. Same work, equal pay. The agreements underestimated up to $50,000 to directly employed BHP coal mines, reduced crucial rights such as accident compensation and allowed workers to be transferred to one of the company`s mines across the country. In May 2019, the parties were informed that the EP had decided not to apply to the unions to make further requests or to hear witnesses, but to allow the unions to be heard at the June 2019 hearing on all the issues they had tried to clarify regarding the approval of the proposed agreements. Following the oral proceedings, the parties filed further motions, the last of which was filed in August 2019. „The payment and terms of the services transaction agreements were well below the overtime and conditions for permanent miners at BHP`s sites, which have been negotiated for decades. After a long campaign by the AWU and other unions, the FWC rejected BHP`s requests for approval of two employment contracts. A „Full Bench” found that the agreements had not actually been concluded by the employees concerned, with BHP denying them access to critical information on pay rates. Full Bench, composed of Vice-President Hatcher and Vice-President Booth and Colman, on Friday, May 8, 2020, found that DP Boyce did not properly consider the agreements on the basis of legal admission criteria and should have taken more account of union objections to the agreements.